Comparing these two stat lines through two years of college is unfair, and maybe ridiculous....

Player 1: 25.9 ppg, 7.1 rpg, 3.4 apg, 2.3 spg, 1.8 bpg., 3.7 topg....52.8% scoring efficiency.

Player 2: 26.8 ppg, 7 rpg, 7.6 apg, 1.4 spg, .5 bpg, 4.8 topg....60% scoring efficiency.

The first player has a much higher defensive load, which can contribute to lower scoring efficiency due to pure exhaustion. The second player has a higher offensive load, which leads to more turnovers. Both players have similar rebounding loads. The first player plays in a system without reciprocal gravity, as in she plays in a system that allows teams to key on her with only moderate pain from other, open, players scoring. The second player clearly has massive reciprocal gravity judging by her assists alone...this helps the second player's scoring efficiency. The first player is very likely the better defender. But, the point is that the two players play in clearly different systems judging from stats alone. The first players system clearly values defense more than the second player, while the second player's astronomical total points created looks like a run and shoot system which can inflate numbers.

These are clearly two great players, but it is silly to compare statistically for the reasons stated above.