John Prior Sentencing Closing Statement- Word Salad

1) Says original indictment said the overt act was "espousing religious belief to justify killings", whah, see the defense changed it!!!

2) he vaguely re-argued the SSW google search

3) He argues/suggests Joe Ryan and Charles Vallow killed by Lori for life insurance in an very awkward way.

4) Argues no renumeration by Chad via insurance. Says this has nothing to do with money! Just killing.

5) And none of this is atrocious , as Chad was not present for the killings of the children.

6) Says even if you believe Chad suffocated Tammy, that doesn't rise to "heinous and atrocious." as defined by the judge. another eyeroll

The prosecutors don't even bother to respond. No one there to speak for Chad but Prior. I'm hoping John Prior

has concluded his service. He's done as best as possible, given an impossible task. Inane arguments and all.